Tunzi will release a book on the biggest year ever: "1964: The Year That Changed America and (brought) Me".
According to the JAT Publishing website it should contain over 200 unpublished photo's of Elvis Presley, Muhammed Ali and The Beatles.
Photos with Elvis and the Beatles !? Or just only Beatles photos without Elvis !? Did realy someone took photos of Elvvis and the fab four ??? Tunzi is not cheap. What is the price of this book ??? And are the photos as usuall in black & white ??? Then: what a frog !!!
I stopped bying books from Tunzi. Most of the books are too expensive, too poor quality and are absolutely overrated these days in my opinion. By the way, Elvis met the Beatles in August 1965 and not 1964 !!! Great research Mr. Tunzi. Like Gladyslove said: What a frog.
I wouldn't connect Elvis, Beatles & Ali - 1964 was year of thier success: Beatles conquered America and Ali he won the world heavyweight championship from Sonny Liston. So we can expect photos of them but not necesarily together...
The advertising above parts the name of them. So it looks like if there are pictures of the Beatles and Elvis seperatly shown not together.
Once again, that's good when are we getting Sessions IV ?? It's been about 10 years in the pipeline already. Probably now junked for all we know !.
I watched a programme the other day where The Colonel apparently banned both photos and recordings at the Beatles meeting. I am not a Colonel hater as I think he was instrumental in creating the eternal image, but when I think of this and nothing of the 1961 Benefit shows, no New York filming ,nothing between 1974 and 1976 I do begin to wobble :-)
gorse, yes, you are right, cause when you take Sinatra and how many concerts they filmed at several locations and released I just can´t understand the Colonel. We also could have several concerts. What is filmed, ttwii, on tour that´s all. In concert we will never see in full as an official release. What we have is what a frog !!! There are more concerts filmed by Jimi Hendrix also. I just can´t understand it. No.