As a lifelong modernist you might expect me to bemoan the knee-jerk nostalgia that has put Elvis Presley back on top of the British singles charts; and as a critic of capital I might also be expected to complain about the marketing exercise designed to milk for all its commercial worth the coincidence of Presley's seventieth birthday (8 January) with the thousandth week of sales-based record charts in the UK - a coincidence which conveniently occurs before 50-year copyright on his early hits runs out in many European countries.
However, I never agreed with the no-futurism of the Covent Garden punks who spat on Presley's grave before he was even committed to it, and remain unimpressed by the particularism of Public Enemy who declared 'Elvis never meant shit to me'. Moreover, complaining about the market in music is like protesting against a circle in a wheel.
I would not have chosen the non-vintage 'One Night' for the thousandth Number One. It was originally released while Presley was in the US army making himself respectable (a process that prompted John Lennon to remark that Elvis died in 1958). I concede that in scoring the past two UK Number Ones ('Jailhouse Rock' last week and now 'One Night'), Elvis has twice lowered the bar on sales required to top the charts (21,262 and 20,467 respectively).
Regardless, if the thousandth UK Number One had been the appropriately wintry 'Heartbreak Hotel', and if it topped the UK charts for two months as it did in the USA in 1956, I would be over the (blue) moon.
Pace Public Enemy, here are four reasons why Elvis legitimately lives on in the cultural canon:
1. He crossed musical boundaries between Rhythm'n'Blues and Country'n'Western. While technically not the first to do this, Presley's transgressions were integral rather than occasional, setting the tone for a musical form that was universal rather than parochial. Other white boys were messin' with the blues - Carl Perkins, for example, but their results remain bound to the South, whereas Elvis makes the South sound like everywhere.
2. All cultural life is there. From the louche libido of 'That's All Right' to the existential pain of 'Heartbreak Hotel', through the amphetamine-like adrenaline of 'All Shook Up' to the cartoon angst of 'Jailhouse Rock' and chocolate-box sentiment of 'Are You Lonesome Tonight?', Presley presages the future history of rock and pop, and recapitulates many of the themes of modernism. Compare 'That's All Right' with Gauguin, 'Heartbreak Hotel' with Egon Schiele , 'All Shook Up' with Edvard Munch's 'The Scream' - you get the picture? And if you listen hard to 'Mystery Train' you can hear the sound of industrialism coming off the rails, long before Kraftwerk pulled it off the road with 'Autobahn'.
3. John Lennon got it right: 'Before Elvis there was nothing.' Elvis was the first to represent a new order in popular music and culture. Moreover, the fact that there was widespread cultural resonance for this new aesthetic, ie, it was truly popular and not confined to a bohemian fringe, was a matter of great social significance. Presley's disregard for musical limitations and the social mores and racial boundaries associated with them, together with young people's enthusiasm for his transgression, pointed to the provisional character of the postwar settlement. What his generation threw up in the air would not come down again.
4. But pop charts and cultural studies are not (yet) indistinguishable. Apart from his relevance to the student of cultural and social history, for Elvis to top the charts today there has to be something about his ways which is still winning. There's plenty to choose from: his off-white good looks; the grain of his voice; his much-cited sexuality ('the Pelvis'). But this remains powerful because Elvis is also virginal. As the world's first to penetrate new musical and cultural territory, it was his first time too. He's never been here before, either; and to watch footage or even listen to his early output is to observe the quickening in him when it works - it works as music, it works with women, it works on the audience as a whole (even with the ones who hate it).
Thus the perennial attraction of the young Elvis is that in his sheer delight we can relive the excitement of new cultural horizons opening up. The downside is that each time we relive the experience, the quickening effect gets slower.
Andrew Calcutt has written numerous books on culture and society. His latest work is 'Creative Britain: the re-mediation of social relations in the UK, 1994-2001', and he is currently looking for a new publisher.
Long Live The King - Why Elvis Is Still Number OneBy Andrew Calcutt, January 20, 2005 | Other
harmston wrote on January 20, 2005
Looking for a new publisher? Long may the search continue as great chunks of this are complete drivel! 'Elvis has twice lowered the bar on sales required to top the charts' is ludicrous and non-sensical. Without Elvis, the bar would have been even lower at circa 12000 copies sold. There's a perfectly valid argument for saying that Elvis has extended the life of the Singles' chart - without the additional sales (above the no 2 record) and intense media interest, the chart would meander along as a minority interest for 10-13 year olds of this world. To compare Elvis to Carl Perkins is facile in the extreme. I believe Carl's first recording sessions was in 55 and not until Elvis had moved to RCA did Carl start recording R 'n' R or rockabilly songs. Certainly the likes of Movie Magg and Turn Around are more Hillbilly than R 'n' R and the Perkins Brothers Band were certainly not singing rockabilly prior to this. Carl had a hell of a lot of talent but neither he nor anyone else could (or can) approach anything like the talent Elvis had, of course, there primary talents were in different areas, Elvis as an interpreter and singer and Carl as a guitarist and song writer... One Night 'non-vintage'? Jeez, simply unbelieveable. Don't give up the day job son...
RobIreland wrote on January 21, 2005
Harmston I agree with you totaly. This article is a lot of pompus drivil by someone trying his best to make himself sound highly educated. Educated my ass! What I could laugh at about these people is that when they talk about Elvis and his musiv all they are ever aware of is the hits, and just the fifties ones at that. Never to they relate to works of genius such as "I Just Cant Help Beliving", "Stranger in my own Hometown" or any of the lesser known gems that is the talent of Elvis Presley. People like this guy just hasent got a clue what hes talking about, just trying to further his own career.
EspenK wrote on January 21, 2005
I found this to be a well written article and a nice read. I think its interesting to see how "outsiders" view Elvis, and their opinion about such things as the recent UK Chart events. Do they care at all? Apparently some do. And thats great!
RobIreland wrote on January 21, 2005
Espen no offence to you but why is there always people like yourself who always seem to fail in seeing the obvious flaws in write ups like this. If this author is such an expert on Elvis how come he only mentions a few very famous fifties songs. Im quite sure he believes Elvis just exsisted in the fifties and recorded around 5 tunes. This write up represents only a very very small part of Elvis' career and inacuratly too.
EspenK wrote on January 22, 2005
Who claim he is an Elvis expert? Certainly not me, and not him either, as far as I can see. And that was more or less my point. I think its interesting to read non-fans opinions on Elvis-related topics, now and then. Especially when they are positive :)
King Of Western Bop wrote on January 22, 2005
Harmston. I actually saw a 1980's interview with Carl Perkins in which he stated that it was hearing Elvis' first recording that made him head for Memphis. He also stated that Elvis was born to be what he became and will forever be - the king of rock n roll. At least he did give Elvis some credit, unlike those that think he deserves none and think that others should be given the credit for creating rock n roll. Still, they have ulteria motives for thinking such nonesense. My reason for thinking Elvis was the creator and king of rock n roll? It's simple really - because he was. In the end who cares what anyone else (including the writer of the article) thinks.
dailyone wrote on January 29, 2005
who gives a you know what what lemon sorry lennon thinks . lennon was one of the fem 4 sorry fab 4 as the ladies would have written better music than those over-rated mops . if other groups and singers hadnt followed them the mid 60's music would have been better and elvis' film songs were much better .